|
The Canon lenses are also fantastic; I have owned the high-quality standard 50/1.4, the portrait 85/1.8, the mid telephoto 70-200/4.0, the amazing 100/2.8 macro,and the wide-angle 17-40 L. I have never had any problems with this camera and it has performed amazingly. 2. I have the same original batteries that I got with my camera.
The grip, somewhat small, can take getting used to. My batteries have always lasted a long time before needing to be recharged; when I shot sports I could use one battery for roughly the whole day. Canon products are very high quality, which is what you can expect with brand name Japanese electronics. I have had this camera for over five (5) years and I absolutely love it. Eight MP will give you high-quality prints. The amount of noise at 1600 ISO makes these pictures generally unusable.
The AF system is not robust enough for sports; you can do it but it's hard. 3.
Unless you want to blow up your pictures to poster size this camera will be great for you. I have taken around 50,000 pictures with my Rebel and it is still going strong.
4. These are all fantastic lenses to put on your Rebel, and you can rest assured that there is a whole range of Canon products to suit your needs.
The only downside to these products is that they are quite expensive.As far as the Rebel, the only complaints I have are these: 1. The camera can't take too many RAW or high quality JPEG pictures in succession (important for sports).In general this camera is a dream for most peoples uses.
If you want to see the quality this is capable of check out my flickr site [.].Buy this camera with the 50mm F/1.8 lens, the 18-55mm IS lens and a cheap Sunpak 383 flash and you'll be happy with your pictures -providing you read up on how to use it to maximize the quality of this camera. I shoot models, family portraits and weddings and have never wished for a better camera.
Now with that said, I did invest in some high quality but affordable glass and some off camera flashes with triggers. I'm a professional photographer who not only started out with this camera but still use it exclusively.
It has plenty of megapixels even for enlargements up to 11X14 without losing quality. The next step up from this camera would probably be a full frame camera that would cost thousands of dollars.
This little affordable camera will take you VERY far. I think my only complaint and it's minor, is that the LCD screen is rather small.
Good place to start is blogs and especially the forums on flickr.everything you ever wanted to know or ask has already been addressed there.just search
Allow me to preface this review by saying that I love my little Rebel and would hate to part from it. Get a 50mm f/1.8 instead, or a Sigma 17-70 f/2.8-4.5, or be like me and get an 85mm f/1.8. There have been times where I have shot at f/1.8, 1/30, and still been underexposing by 2/3 of a stop.
The autofocus is slow, and faulty for dark places. Just don't expect it to be more.Oh - and that 18-55 f/3.5-5.6. It was great when I was just learning how to deal with a dSLR - easy to use, simple controls, intuitive (much more so than the Nikon I use occasionally).all-around a great little guy.However, for the really serious photographer, it leaves some things to be desired.
Thank goodness for the RAW format.For what it is, the Rebel is great. The ISO goes only to 1600, and even then the noise is nearly unmanageable. 1600 is not that great either - I am lucky that I have a f/1.8 lens.
it is a good thing to skip. All better lenses, and the 50mm is even less expensive.
This item works wonders. It was everything I expected. It is extremely helpful with my photography, I mean, of course, it's a Canon. I was very pleased with my purchase.
Canon tech support was compltely useless and bascially told me that the only option was to send it in. To add to my frustrations they never indicated what was wrong with the camera. I thought it was a poor battery so I ordered 2 more, which had no effect. I received my Canon Digital Rebel XT in 1/08. Now that I go back and look at these camera reviews again I am seeing that other people had the same problem as me.what a disappointment.FYI - Should this happen to you and you haven't sent your camera in yet, the written warranty is 12 months, but the Canon repair rep told us they will honor warranty repairs up to 14 months (they don't advertise that). However, I feel it has to be paid because of the amount of money I already invested in it and how much more it would cost just to buy a new camera.
That's a lot of money for something I owned for such a short period of time.
There are not local shops to fix these cameras because they are so intricate and specialized.
Just like another reviewer asked, is it wrong to think that such an expensive piece of equipment should last longer than 13-14 months.
Despite some minor complaints with the design of the camera, I enjoyed it for just over 12 months until it seemed the battery was quickly fizzling out and then suddenly stopped powering on all together.
All I was told was how much it would cost to fix it.
So I went ahead and spent the money to send it in, which isn't cheap when you add the insurance factor.
Now I just found out that it will cost $228 to get the thing fixed.
Needless to say I have lost my faith in Canon and don't plan on buying another one of their cameras.
|
